

Myths & facts about pain Rn, Feb 1998 Sonia R Strevy Abstract: Several misconceptions about pain relief are examined. The goal of chronic pain management is to keep the patient as comfortable as possible, not to keep the dose as low as possible. Full Text: Debunking these misconceptions will allow you to provide more effective-more compassionate-pain relief. Surveys show that severe, chronic pain is such a frightening prospect to many patients that they would prefer dying to enduring it. One study of patients with metastatic cancer, for instance, found that seven out of 10 would consider suicide if they couldn't obtain adequate pain relief.1 It is that same dread that prompts some patients in severe pain to look to clinicians for help in ending their lives. Recent Supreme Court decisions-one upholding state bans on assisted suicide, the other permitting Oregon's assisted suicide law to stand-have forced the healthcare community to take a closer look at how to provide better endof-life care. Above all else, that means finding improved ways of relieving pain. And it's not just chronic pain that needs to be treated more effectively: About half of all postop patients suffer needlessly from acute pain because they're undermedicated.2 A large part of the problem is the number of myths about pain that continue to circulate. Here we will expose some of the more common ones. MYTH: The goal of chronic pain management is to keep the dose of medication as low as possible. Wrong. Pain experts agree that the real goal should be to keep the patient as comfortable as possible and to promote a better quality of life. Usually the best way to accomplish this is to combine medication with other treatment options. These non-drug approaches often help reduce the need for medication and in the process may reduce the cost of care and drug reactions; but they are not substitutes for pain medication given at optimal doses. Among the non-drug options that can complement pain medication, consider the following: Massage, pressure, and vibration can help relax the patient and distract him so he has less time to concentrate on the pain. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) provides pain relief by blocking the pain impulses traveling to the patient's brain. Exercise will mobilize the patient's joints, strengthen weak muscles, and improve cardiovascular conditioning, all of which can help alleviate pain. Heat and cold applications can help ease pain, depending on the individual patient and his circumstances. Don't use heat on irradiated tissue or tumor sites, however. It's best to avoid cold over irradiated tissue, and in patients with peripheral vascular disease. The other non-drug approaches worth considering include progressive muscle relaxation, guided imagery, and therapeutic touch. MYTH: Because opioids can easily cause addiction, they should be given only to end-stage cancer patients. Many clinicians exaggerate the risk of addiction and needlessly deprive patients of opioids-or they give too low a dose. This reluctance is based in part on confusion surrounding the terms physical dependence and psychological dependence, or addiction. Physical dependence on opioids may occur after two to three weeks of therapy, depending in part on the dose that's being given. For patients on drugs like codeine or morphine, which have a short half-life, symptoms such as anxiety, chills, irritability, hot flashes, joint pain, sweating, and vomiting emerge six to 12 hours after the drug is abruptly discontinued. For drugs like levorphanol (Levo-Dromoran) and transdermal fentanyl (Duragesic), which have a long half-life, it takes 24 hours or more and symptoms are usually less severe. But psychological dependency is a very different phenomenon. In the words of one expert panel, it is the "compulsive use of a substance resulting in physical, psychological, or social harm to the user and continued use despite that harm."3 A number of studies have shown that cancer patients on long-term opioids very rarely fall into this trap! Of course, that doesn't mean patients should be given an opioid when a less potent drug will do the job. To avoid that tendency, the World Health Organization developed a three-step analgesic ladder that outlines a systematic approach to opioid therapy.5 The first line of defense, indicated for the least severe pain, includes oral analgesics such as acetaminophen and ibuprofen. These drugs should be used along with adjuvant medications like antidepressants, anticonvulsants, and antiemetics, when needed. Second-line treatment includes mild opioids like codeine, combined with the first-line treatments, as needed. Third-line therapy, for the most resistant pain, includes the use of a strong opioid like morphine or fentanyl (Duragesic, Sublimaze). To avoid a seesaw effect, a regular dosing schedule is best, but it needs to be individualized and then fine-tuned, not written in stone. Some patients will need pain medication q2h or even more often to gain adequate relief. Other patients, like those on long-acting meds, will need a less frequent dosing schedule. While a patient-reported pain scale is helpful in identifying the severity of pain, it's only one part of a complete pain assessment. To remember the other areas to cover, keep in mind the mnemonic P,Q,R,S,T: Precipitating/alleviating factors. What causes the pain? What aggravates or relieves it? For instance, does the leg hurt while walking but feel better with rest? Has any medication or treatment worked in the past? Quality of pain. Ask the patient to describe the pain, using words like sharp, dull, stabbing, stinging, and burning. Sharp, stinging pain often originates in the skin while an aching or burning pain suggests a deeper problem. Radiation. Determine if the pain exists in only one location or if it radiates to other areas. A patient who says his pain is localized in the hip area, for instance, may be suffering from arthritis. But someone who says it also radiates to the thigh, behind the knee, and into the ankle may be suffering from a sciatic condition.6 Severity. Have the patient use a descriptive, numeric, or visual scale to relay how bad the pain is. (With the 0 -10 scale, for instance, 0 indicates no pain and 10 means the worst pain imaginable.) Timing. Ask whether the pain is constant or intermittent, when it began, and whether it pulsates or has some rhythmic pattern to it. Each of these changes suggests different diagnoses and treatments. Quite the contrary. Many patients in pain don't ask for medication, and many of those who do don't ask early enough to obtain adequate pain control. There are several reasons for this: Some patients avoid drugs because they are afraid of the side effects, or because they're timid or passive and don't want to bother the nurse with a request. Others find it hard to ask for pain relief because it conflicts with their cultural norms and beliefs. Still other patients don't ask because they believe, mistakenly, that their pain is inevitable and untreatable. Let your patients know that most pain can be controlled. Explain the relative benefits and risks of the drugs you're administering to help allay fear of adverse effects. Also explain that giving medication in anticipation of pain, especially prior to painful procedures or before the patient's activity level is about to increase, can help "catch" pain before it becomes unmanageable. Finally, adopt an approachable demeanor and get patients more actively involved in all aspects of their care. This may give timid patients the courage to speak up when they need pain relief. MYTH: If the patient doesn't look like he's in pain, it's okay to withhold medication or decrease the dose. Pain is an extremely subjective phenomenon, perceived and expressed by each patient in his own unique way. Some may cope with their suffering by wailing or crying; others with the same degree of pain may present with a calm, quiet appearance. Since only the patient knows how much pain he's experiencing, you need to ask him about it-at regular intervals. Using a pain scale, as mentioned earlier, can help monitor changes in intensity as well. So can checking vital signs: An elevated blood pressure or heart rate suggests that he's in pain even if he doesn't look or act like it. MYTH: The side effects of pain are limited to discomfort and increases in heart rate and BP. These reactions are only the tip of the iceberg. Acute pain may contribute to wound dehiscence or cause guarding and decreased mobility. The latter may contribute to pneumonia and embolism. Chronic pain diminishes quality of life and may also bring on anxiety, depression, and a sense of helplessness. The stress of seeing a loved one suffer, along with financial burdens resulting from the illness, can take a heavy toll on family members, too. And nurses can easily become frustrated when pain is poorly controlled, resulting in feelings of inadequacy and helplessness. No matter how hard we try, we all fall prey to prevailing misconceptions and half-truths at times. Making a conscious effort to get all the facts about pain relief will make our patients a lot more comfortable. o Take the open-book multiple-choice CE test that follows this article and earn two contact hours from the RN/AUHS Home Study Program. You should be able to: 1. Describe the different classifications of pain. 2. Evaluate the effectiveness of pain management plans. 3. Recognize common myths related to pain. Other CE options are explained on page 41. REFERENCES 1. Foley, K. M. (1995). Misconceptions and controversies regarding the use of opioids in cancer pain. Anticancer Drugs, 6(Suppl. 3), 4. 2. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. (1992). Clinical practice guideline: Acute pain management: Operative or medical proCedures and trauma. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 3. Rinaldi, R. C., Steindler, E. M., et al. (1988). Clarification and standardization of substance abuse: Terminology. JAMA, 259(4), 555. 4. Portenoy, R. K., & Payne, R. (1992). Acute and chronic pain. In J. H. Lowinson, P. Ruiz, & R. B. Millman (Eds.), Substance abuse: A comprehensive textbook (2nd ed.), (pp. 691 - 721). Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins. 5. Drourr, N., Bajwa, Z., & Warfield, C. (1997). Cancer Pain. Seminars in Anesthesia , 16(2), 105. 6. Burrell, L. 0. (1992). Adult nursing in hospital and community settings (pp. 186 187). Norwalk, CT: Appleton & Lange. SONIA STREW is the president of Health Education, Inc, a Wabash, Indiana-based company that develops on-site health and safety programs for a variety of corporations.
This page last updated on August 7, 1998.
Copyright © 1997, 1998 Hammond Family Network